Comparison

Cursor vs Windsurf

Cursor vs Windsurf in 2026: features, agent capabilities, MCP support, pricing, model access, and which AI-first IDE wins for which workflow.

Short answer

Cursor wins on inline tab-completion polish, ecosystem maturity, and rules format flexibility (.cursorrules + .mdc). Windsurf wins on agentic 'Cascade' flows, supercomplete, and tight Codeium-backed enterprise features.

Cursor

Anysphere

AI-first fork of VS Code

Best for: Developers who want the most polished AI-first IDE with mature ecosystem and rules support.

Visit Cursor →

Windsurf

Codeium

Agentic IDE with Cascade flows

Best for: Teams wanting strong agent flows, enterprise SSO, and Codeium's broader code intelligence stack.

Visit Windsurf →

Feature comparison

Underlying editor

CursorVS Code fork
WindsurfVS Code fork

Inline tab completion

CursorBest-in-class
WindsurfSupercomplete, comparable

Agentic mode

CursorAgent mode, Composer
WindsurfEdgeCascade, strong flows

Project rules

CursorEdge.cursorrules + .mdc
Windsurf.windsurfrules

MCP support

CursorNative
WindsurfNative

Skills (SKILL.md)

CursorEdgeVia skills-hub --target cursor
WindsurfVia MCP server + skills-hub

Enterprise SSO + audit

CursorAvailable on Business plan
WindsurfEdgeStrong (Codeium for Enterprise)

Model access

CursorClaude, GPT, Gemini
WindsurfClaude, GPT, plus Codeium models

Pricing (Pro)

Cursor$20/mo
WindsurfEdge$15/mo

Free tier

CursorHobby with cap
WindsurfEdgeGenerous free tier

Plugin ecosystem

CursorFull VS Code extensions
WindsurfFull VS Code extensions

Pick Cursor when

  • →You want the most mature AI-first IDE ecosystem
  • →You're on the bleeding edge of rules and skills (Cursor supports both .cursorrules legacy and .mdc)
  • →You're a solo dev or small team
  • →Your team already uses VS Code extensions heavily

Pick Windsurf when

  • →You want strong agent / Cascade flows out of the box
  • →You need enterprise SSO and audit at a lower price point
  • →You're already on Codeium's autocomplete and want to consolidate
  • →Your team has 10+ devs and wants centralized billing

Verdict

Cursor is the most popular choice for solo devs and small teams, the polish and rules ecosystem are unmatched. Windsurf wins for teams that want agentic Cascade flows, Codeium's broader code intelligence, and stronger enterprise features at a lower price.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use the same skills in Cursor and Windsurf?

Yes. Both speak MCP, and skills-hub exposes the entire 4,900+ skill catalog as MCP prompts via `npx @skills-hub-ai/mcp`. Skills installed via the CLI work in either IDE.

Which is faster?

Both are VS Code forks with comparable performance. Inline completion latency is a wash, both use streaming completions from frontier models. Cursor edges slightly faster on cold starts.

Does Cursor support Windsurf-style 'Cascade' agent flows?

Cursor's Composer and agent mode are the closest equivalent. Cascade is more flow-oriented (orchestrated multi-step plans); Cursor's Composer is more chat-driven.

Which is better for enterprise teams?

Windsurf, Codeium's enterprise tier has been around longer and has more mature SSO, audit logging, and SOC 2 documentation. Cursor's Business plan is catching up fast.

Can I migrate my .cursorrules to Windsurf?

Mostly yes. Windsurf's .windsurfrules is a similar single-file format. The skills-hub CLI converts SKILL.md to either format automatically with `--target cursor` or `--target windsurf`.

Related comparisons

Claude Code vs Cursor
Pick Claude Code if you want a terminal-native agent with deep file-system access, parallel sub-agents, and the best Cla…
Claude Skills vs Cursor Rules
Cursor rules load on every conversation as ambient project context. Claude skills load only when their triggers match. R…

Install skills that work in both

Skills follow the open Agent Skills standard, install once, use in any AI tool.

Browse 4,900+ skills →