Comparison

Cursor vs Cline

Cursor vs Cline in 2026: proprietary AI-first IDE vs open-source VS Code agent extension. Pricing, agent autonomy, transparency, MCP, and skills support.

Short answer

Cursor wins on polish, inline autocomplete, and ecosystem maturity. Cline wins on transparency, open source (Apache 2.0), and BYO-API-key flexibility. Pick Cursor for turnkey IDE; pick Cline for full control and pay-per-token economics.

Cursor

Anysphere

AI-first fork of VS Code

Best for: Devs who want the most polished AI-first IDE.

Visit Cursor →

Cline

Cline Bot Inc.

Open-source autonomous coding agent for VS Code

Best for: Devs who want open source, BYO API key, and per-step approvals.

Visit Cline →

Feature comparison

Feature	Cursor	Cline
Open source	No	EdgeYes, Apache 2.0
Editor	VS Code fork	VS Code extension
Pricing	$20/mo Pro	EdgeFree (BYO API key)
Inline autocomplete	EdgeBest-in-class	Limited
Agent mode	Composer, agent mode	Native, runs autonomously
Per-step approval UI	Auto-run by default	EdgeYes, every step approved
BYO API key	No (Cursor-hosted)	EdgeYes, any provider
Model access	Claude, GPT, Gemini	EdgeAny, Claude, GPT, OpenRouter, local
Rules format	Edge.cursorrules + .mdc	.clinerules
MCP support	Native	Native

Open source

CursorNo

ClineEdgeYes, Apache 2.0

Editor

CursorVS Code fork

ClineVS Code extension

Pricing

Cursor$20/mo Pro

ClineEdgeFree (BYO API key)

Inline autocomplete

CursorEdgeBest-in-class

ClineLimited

Agent mode

CursorComposer, agent mode

ClineNative, runs autonomously

Per-step approval UI

CursorAuto-run by default

ClineEdgeYes, every step approved

BYO API key

CursorNo (Cursor-hosted)

ClineEdgeYes, any provider

Model access

CursorClaude, GPT, Gemini

ClineEdgeAny, Claude, GPT, OpenRouter, local

Rules format

CursorEdge.cursorrules + .mdc

Cline.clinerules

MCP support

CursorNative

ClineNative

Pick Cursor when

→You want best-in-class inline tab completion
→You want one flat subscription
→You're already on a Cursor Business plan
→You're a solo dev who values polish

Pick Cline when

→You want full transparency on agent actions
→You're price-sensitive (pay per token)
→You want to use enterprise API keys you already own
→You value open-source code you can audit

Verdict

Cursor is the turnkey choice, install, sign in, get coding. Cline is the transparent choice, see and approve every action, pay only for tokens, use any model. Many devs run both (Cline as a VS Code extension inside Cursor) and pick per task.

Frequently asked questions

Can I run Cline inside Cursor?

Yes, Cline is a VS Code extension and Cursor is a VS Code fork. Many devs use Cursor's inline completion plus Cline's per-step agent in the same editor.

Which is cheaper for heavy use?

Depends. For light use Cline (BYO key) is cheaper. For heavy daily use Cursor's flat $20/mo often beats per-token costs.

Can I use the same skills?

Yes, both speak MCP. Install skills-hub-ai/mcp and the 4,900+ skill catalog appears as MCP prompts in both.

Which is safer?

Cline's per-step approval gives you tighter control. Cursor's auto-run agent is faster but you must review diffs after the fact.

Can I migrate from one to the other?

Yes. The skills-hub CLI converts SKILL.md to either .cursorrules / .mdc or .clinerules at install time. Settings and extensions port over because both are VS Code-based.

Related comparisons

Cline vs Cursor

Cline wins on transparency, open source, and BYO-API-key flexibility. Cursor wins on inline tab-completion, ecosystem ma…

Claude Code vs Cursor

Pick Claude Code if you want a terminal-native agent with deep file-system access, parallel sub-agents, and the best Cla…

Install skills that work in both

Skills follow the open Agent Skills standard, install once, use in any AI tool.

Browse 4,900+ skills →