Comparison

Continue.dev vs Cline

Continue.dev vs Cline in 2026: two Apache 2.0 AI coding tools for VS Code. Continue is multi-IDE BYO-model plugin; Cline is VS Code agent with per-step approval.

Short answer

Continue.dev is the broader open-source plugin, VS Code + JetBrains, BYO any model, lightweight. Cline is the agent, VS Code only, per-step approval, deeper autonomy. Pick Continue.dev for multi-IDE + lightweight; pick Cline for agentic depth and per-step safety.

Continue.dev

Continue Dev Inc.

Free open-source AI plugin for VS Code + JetBrains

Best for: Devs wanting a free open-source AI assistant across multiple IDEs with BYO model.

Visit Continue.dev →

Cline

Cline Bot Inc.

Open-source autonomous coding agent for VS Code

Best for: Devs wanting open-source agent autonomy with per-step approval in VS Code.

Visit Cline →

Feature comparison

License

Continue.devApache 2.0
ClineApache 2.0

Pricing

Continue.devFree (BYO API key)
ClineFree (BYO API key)

IDE support

Continue.devEdgeVS Code + JetBrains
ClineVS Code only

Agent autonomy

Continue.devLess agentic, chat + completions
ClineEdgeStrong agent autonomy

Per-step approval

Continue.devPer-edit approval
ClineEdgeYes, approve every action

MCP support

Continue.devNative (newer)
ClineEdgeNative (mature)

Config complexity

Continue.devEdgeLighter
ClineHeavier (more knobs)

Pick Continue.dev when

  • →You use JetBrains or want multi-IDE
  • →You want chat + autocomplete, not agent
  • →You're cost-conscious BYO model
  • →You want a mature plugin ecosystem

Pick Cline when

  • →You want stronger agent autonomy
  • →You want per-step approval before tool calls
  • →You're VS Code-only
  • →You want first-class MCP + skills

Verdict

Continue.dev is the lightweight multi-IDE option. Cline is the heavier agent option for VS Code with per-step approval safety. Pick Continue.dev for low-friction across IDEs; pick Cline to delegate multi-step work to an agent and see every action.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use both?

Yes, Continue.dev for autocomplete and Cline for agent in VS Code.

Which uses less of my API budget?

Continue.dev, chat + autocomplete, not agent loops. Cline consumes more tokens per session.

Can I use Claude/GPT/Gemini in both?

Yes, both support BYO key for any major provider.

Which has better MCP support?

Cline has more mature MCP; Continue.dev's is newer but works.

Does either replace Cursor?

Not for the polished IDE, both are plugins. See cline-vs-cursor for that comparison.

Related comparisons

Cline vs Cursor
Cline wins on transparency, open source, and BYO-API-key flexibility. Cursor wins on inline tab-completion, ecosystem ma…
Cline vs Claude Code
Cline is open-source (Apache 2.0), BYO-API-key, runs as a VS Code extension with per-step approval, full transparency, p…
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Pick Cursor if you want a dedicated AI-first IDE with the best Composer / agent mode and broad model choice. Pick Copilo…

Install skills that work in both

Skills follow the open Agent Skills standard, install once, use in any AI tool.

Browse 4,900+ skills →